Lucero v. Medina et al

Filing 43

MINUTE ORDER: It is HEREBY ORDERED that the Supplemental Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Doc. # 42 ), filed by Applicant on June 17, 2013, is DENIED for the reasons stated in the June 17, 2013 Order Denying Motion to Reconsider (Doc. # 40 ) . It is FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel for Further Proceedings or Appeal (Doc. # 41 ) is DENIED. If Applicant files a Notice of Appeal, he may file a motion for appointment of counsel in the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 07/02/13. (alvsl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-01919-RPM ANTHONY J. LUCERO, Applicant, v. ANGEL MEDINA, Warden, and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado, Respondents. MINUTE ORDER ENTERED BY DISTRICT JUDGE RAYMOND P. MOORE It is HEREBY ORDERED that the Supplemental Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment [Doc. # 42], filed by Applicant on June 17, 2013, is DENIED for the reasons stated in the June 17, 2013 Order Denying Motion to Reconsider [Doc. # 40]. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel for Further Proceedings or Appeal [Doc. # 41] is DENIED. If Applicant files a Notice of Appeal, he may file a motion for appointment of counsel in the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. DATED: July 2, 2013. BY THE COURT: ________________________________________ RAYMOND P. MOORE United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?