Vreeland v. Suthers
ORDER denying 139 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Motion for Sanction Against Defendant's Counsel, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/3/14.(sgrim)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 12BcvB01921BPABBKMT
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II,
SERGEANT GRIGGS, CDOC/BVCF Mailroom,
This matter appears before the court on Plaintiff’s “Motion to Compel Production of
Documents Motion for Sanction Against Defendant’s Counsel” [Doc. No. 139].
Pursuant to the court’s direction, Defendant’s counsel has thoroughly investigated the
contents of the file maintained on the Plaintiff by the Department of Corrections. As a result,
Defendant has produced additional documents in discovery and has engaged a forensic
handwriting expert to address certain disputed facts.
After reviewing the Report filed by Defendant’s counsel [Doc. No. 150], the court is
satisfied that Defendant has diligently searched for and produced all documents relevant to the
matters at issue in this case.
Therefore, it is ORDERED
Plaintiff’s “Motion to Compel Production of Documents Motion for Sanction Against
Defendant’s Counsel” [Doc. No. 139] is DENIED.
Dated this 3d day of October, 2014.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?