Malibu Media v. John Does 1-42

Filing 148

MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 69 Defendant Doe 22's Motion to Sever and Dismiss, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/29/2013. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01953-WYD-MEH
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
BRIAN BATZ, and
JOHN DOES 7, 9-11, 15-31, 33-35, 39
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on May 29, 2013.
In light of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint [docket #82], Defendant Doe 22's Motion
to Sever and Dismiss [filed November 15, 2013; docket #69] is denied as moot. See Franklin v.
Kansas Dep’t of Corr., 160 F. App'x 730, 734 (10th Cir. 2005) (“An amended complaint supersedes
the original complaint and renders the original complaint of no legal effect.”) (citing Miller v. Glanz,
948 F. 2d 1562, 1565 (10th Cir. 1991)). If Defendant Doe 22 wishes to renew his requests for relief,
he must do so in separate motions. See D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1C (“A motion shall be made in
separate paper.”).
The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this minute order to Defendant Doe 22
at the address provided in docket #35. The Certificate of Service shall not state the address to which
the minute order is sent. However, the minute order itself shall not be restricted.