Malibu Media v. John Does 1-42
Filing
30
Minute ORDER. Doe #41's Motion for Leave to Proceed Anonymously 25 is granted in part for the sole purpose of permitting Doe #41 to challenge the subpoena served on CenturyLink. Doe #41's Motion for Leave to File Under Restriction the Sup plement to the Motion to Proceed Anonymously 26 is granted in part and denied in part, and the Clerk of the Court is instructed to maintain Defendant Doe #41's Supplement to the Motion to Proceed Anonymously [26-1] under seal at Restriction Level 2, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/27/12.(lygsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01953-WYD-MEH
PATRICK COLLINS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN DOES 1-42,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on September 27, 2012.
Pending before the Court are Doe #41's Motion for Leave to Proceed Anonymously and
Defendant Doe #41's Motion for Leave to File Under Restriction the Supplement to the Motion to
Proceed Anonymously [filed September 24, 2012; docket #26]. The Court observes that both
Motions refer to a subpoena served on CenturyLink; however, no motion to quash has been filed.
Mindful that a motion to quash may be forthcoming, the Court finds as follows.
Doe #41's Motion for Leave to Proceed Anonymously [filed September 24, 2012; docket
#25] is granted in part for the sole purpose of permitting Doe #41 to challenge the subpoena served
on CenturyLink. However, Doe #41's request to proceed anonymously throughout the entirety of
discovery is denied as premature.
In addition, Defendant Doe #41's Motion for Leave to File Under Restriction the Supplement
to the Motion to Proceed Anonymously [filed September 24, 2012; docket #26] is granted in part
and denied in part, and the Clerk of the Court is instructed to maintain Defendant Doe #41's
Supplement to the Motion to Proceed Anonymously [docket #26-1] under seal at Restriction Level
2 until the Court orders otherwise. Though the Court acknowledges that Doe #41 has only requested
a Level 1 restriction, the Court is concerned that providing Plaintiff’s counsel with Doe #41's
identifying information will effectively render moot any forthcoming motion to quash. Therefore,
in an abundance of caution, the Court will limit access to Doe #41's identifying information to the
Court and to Doe #41's counsel until all issues arising from the CenturyLink subpoena have been
resolved.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?