Malibu Media v. John Does 1-42

Filing 52

MINUTE ORDER. Defendant Doe #41's Unopposed Motion for ContinuedPermission to Proceed Anonymously 43 and Defendant Doe #41's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Plead, or Otherwise Respond to the Amended Complaint 42 . Both motions are granted as set forth in this Minute Order by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/23/12.(jjhsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-01953-WYD-MEH PATRICK COLLINS, INC., Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOES 1-42, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on October 23, 2012. Pending before the Court are Defendant Doe #41's Unopposed Motion for Continued Permission to Proceed Anonymously [filed October 19, 2012; docket #43] and Defendant Doe #41's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Plead, or Otherwise Respond to the Amended Complaint Filed October 18, 2012 [filed October 19, 2012; docket #42]. Both motions are granted as follows. First, Doe #41 shall file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s amended complaint on or before November 2, 2012. In accordance with this extension, Defendant Doe #41 may continue proceeding anonymously for the sole purpose of filing a motion to dismiss, a motion to sever, or negotiating a settlement with Plaintiff. If, by November 2, 2012, Doe #41 has not filed either of the aforementioned motions or notified the Court of a settlement, the Court will remove any and all restrictions on Doe #41's identifying information. However, if an aforementioned motion is filed by the deadline and following the resolution of the motion, Doe #41 must request additional permission to continue proceeding anonymously.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?