American Implement, Inc. v. Wilson et al
Filing
16
ORDER Granting 15 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Claims Asserted Against Defendant Layne Atwater, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/30/12.(sgrim)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01962-LTB
AMERICAN IMPLEMENT, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
COURTNEY WILSON,
LAYNE ATWATER, and
LARRY HOLLAND,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIMS
ASSERTED AGAINST DEFENDANT LAYNE ATWATER
______________________________________________________________________________
THE COURT, having reviewed Plaintiff American Implement, Inc.'s ("American
Implement") Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Claims Asserted Against Defendant Layne Atwater (the
"Motion") (Doc 15) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), and being fully advised in the premises and
good cause shown therefor, HEREBY
ORDERS that the Motion shall be and is hereby GRANTED. The claims American
Implement asserts in its Complaint [Doc. No. 1] (the "Complaint") only inasmuch as they are
asserted against Defendant Layne Atwater (the "Atwater Claims") shall be and are hereby
DISMISSED with prejudice, with American Implement and Defendant Layne Atwater to bear its/his
own attorneys' fees and costs only with regard to the Atwater Claims; and
FURTHER ORDERS that this Order does not and shall not affect or otherwise alter the
claims asserted in the Complaint against Defendants Courtney Wilson and Larry Holland.
BY THE COURT:
s/Lewis T. Babcock
United States District Court Judge
DATED: October 30, 2012
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?