American Implement, Inc. v. Wilson et al

Filing 16

ORDER Granting 15 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Claims Asserted Against Defendant Layne Atwater, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/30/12.(sgrim)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01962-LTB AMERICAN IMPLEMENT, INC., Plaintiff, v. COURTNEY WILSON, LAYNE ATWATER, and LARRY HOLLAND, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIMS ASSERTED AGAINST DEFENDANT LAYNE ATWATER ______________________________________________________________________________ THE COURT, having reviewed Plaintiff American Implement, Inc.'s ("American Implement") Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Claims Asserted Against Defendant Layne Atwater (the "Motion") (Doc 15) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), and being fully advised in the premises and good cause shown therefor, HEREBY ORDERS that the Motion shall be and is hereby GRANTED. The claims American Implement asserts in its Complaint [Doc. No. 1] (the "Complaint") only inasmuch as they are asserted against Defendant Layne Atwater (the "Atwater Claims") shall be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, with American Implement and Defendant Layne Atwater to bear its/his own attorneys' fees and costs only with regard to the Atwater Claims; and FURTHER ORDERS that this Order does not and shall not affect or otherwise alter the claims asserted in the Complaint against Defendants Courtney Wilson and Larry Holland. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock United States District Court Judge DATED: October 30, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?