Banks v. Arapahoe County Detention Center et al

Filing 18

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion for Time Extension to Cure Deficiencies; granting in part and denying in part 17 Declaration: Motion for Response, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/17/2012.(skssl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02014-BNB
TORREY V. BANKS,
Plaintiff,
v.
ARAPAHOE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,
CHIEF WALCHER OF A.C.S.O.
LIEUTENANT KNIGHT OF A.C.S.O.,
SUPERVISOR LIBRARIAN SHEILA CLARK OF A.C.S.O.,
CAPTAIN JOHN DOE OF A.C.S.O., and
DEPUTY KRAUS OF A.C,S.O., Disciplinary Board Member,
DEPUTY GALLEGOS OF A.C.S.O. (Disciplinary Board Member),
DEPUTY JOHN DOE #1 (Disciplinary Board Member),
SERGEANT JOHN DOE OF A.C.S.O.,
ERIN, Librarian Employee of A.C.S.O.,
DEPUTY BENDICROFT of the A.C.S.O.,
DEPUTY JOHN DOE #2 of the A.C.S.O. (Disciplinary Board Member),
DEPUTY JOHN DOE #3 of the A.C.S.O. (Disciplinary Board Member),
OFFICER JANE DOE of Lakewood Police Department,
OFFICER JOHN DOE #1 of Lakewood Police Department, and
OFFICER JOHN DOE #2 of Lakewood Police Department,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND
This matter is before the Court on the motions that Plaintiff, Torrey Banks, filed
pro se on October 4 and 16, 2012 (ECF Nos. 16 and 17), requesting an extension of
time in which to cure deficiencies. To the extent Plaintiff requests an extension of time
to cure the deficiencies designated in the order of August 2, 2012 (ECF No. 6), the
motions are DENIED as moot because Mr. Banks already cured the August 2
designated deficiencies. To the extent Plaintiff requests an extension of time to pay the
$15.00 initial partial filing fee designated in the order of September 13, 2012, granting
him leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 12), the motions are GRANTED.
Plaintiff will be allowed thirty (30) days from the date of this minute order in
which to pay the designated $15.00 initial partial filing fee or show cause as directed in
the September 13 order why he is unable to do so. Failure to comply with the directives
of the September 13 order will result in the dismissal of the instant action.

Dated: October 17, 2012