Carrillo, v. Hickenlooper, et al.,

Filing 310

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 308 Plaintiffs' Opposed Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Pleadings as Statement of Related Cases or Case Association Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d), by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/16/2013. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02034-RM-MEH
ALFONSO A. CARRILLO,
RAYMUNDO CASTILLO,
MARGARITA GARCIA,
SERGIO HERNANDEZ,
GONZALO PEREZ,
GERMAN JASSO BRUNO,
LAURA PATRICIA GUTIERREZ-VITE,
JOSE OROZCO,
MARIA ELENA CARRILLO,
ANA L. CHAVEZ,
DANIEL ORTIZ,
JUAN PABLO REYES,
TERESA MONGE,
JORGE RAMIREZ,
MARTHA ESQUIVEL,
LUIS FIGUEROA,
MANUEL PACHECO,
JOSE A. URENA-SANTOS,
WILLIAM CRISTO SANTOS,
SELVIN CARDOZA,
JESSICA ITURBE JAIME,
JULIO ARREGUIN,
AVARO NUNEZ,
NOHELIA JIMENEZ,
ELIZABETH PADILLA,
MA. DEL ROSARIO URENA,
NORA G. GONZALEZ,
HUGO A PACHECO,
SONIA LOPEZ,
RUBEN PADILLA,
ADRIANA PADILLA,
JANET VALERA,
CLAUDIA OROZCO MOLINA, and
JOSE M. VELASQUEZ,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, the Honorable Governor in his official capacity as Colorado
Governor,
JOHN W. SUTTERS (sic), Colorado Attorney General, in his official capacity as elected Colorado
Attorney General,

ELIZABETH OLDHAM, in her official capacity as 14th Judicial District Attorney,
MITCHELL MORRISSEY, in his official capacity as Second Judicial District Attorney,
DON QUICK, in his official capacity as 17th Judicial District Attorney,
GEORGE H. BRAUCHLER, in his official capacity as 18th Judicial District Attorney,
RODNEY JOHNSON, in his official capacity as elected Grand County Sheriff,
TED MINK, in his official capacity as elected Jefferson County Sheriff,
FRANK THOMAS, in his official capacity as Sheriff,
SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, in its official capacity,
DOUGLAS N. DARR, in his official capacity as elected Adams County Sheriff,
TOM DELAND, in his official capacity as Broomfield Chief of Police,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on October 16, 2013.
Once again, Plaintiffs’ Opposed Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Pleadings as
Statement of Related Cases or Case Association Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d) [filed October 15,
2013; docket #308] is denied without prejudice for the Plaintiffs’ failure each to sign the motion
in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. The Court has previously admonished the Plaintiffs a number
of times of this procedural error. Only three of the currently named Plaintiffs signed the present
motion.

2