Carrillo, v. Hickenlooper, et al.,

Filing 92

ORDER on Motion for Clarification. Before the Court is Plaintiff Alfonso Carrillos Unpossed1 Motion for an Order to Authorize Plaintiffs Law Library and Storage Privileges as Pro-Se Litigant filed November 29, 2012; docket # 81 . To the extent the motion seeks clarification that Mr. Carrillo currently proceeds in this case as a pro se Plaintiff, the record reveals that Mr. Carrillo is, indeed, currently proceeding in this matter without an attorney, and the motion is granted to provide such clarification. Otherwise, all other requests for relief are denied. by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/3/2012.(ervsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-02034-WJM-MEH ALFONSO A. CARRILLO, AUGUSTIN TELLES, RAYMUNDO CASTILLO, MARGARITA GARCIA, SERGIO HERNANDEZ, GONZALO PEREZ, GERMAN JASSO BRUNO, LAURA PATRICIA GUTIERREZ-VITE, JOSE OROZCO, SERGIO SARMIENTO, MARIA SARMIENTO, VERONICA FERNANDEZ BELETA, JOSE LEYVA CARAVEO, MARIA ELENA CARRILLO, ANA L. CHAVEZ, DANIEL ORTIZ, JOSE SARMIENTO, JUAN PABLO REYES, SERGIO IBARRA, MARIA SUSANA IBARRA, TERESA MONGE, RUDY BREDA, JORGE RAMIREZ, MARTHA ESQUIVEL, LUIS FIGUEROA, MANUEL PACHECO, ELVA MENDOZA, JAVIER MENDOZA, JOSE A. URENA-SANTOS, JESUS SANDOVAL, MARIAM BURCIAGA, WILLIAM CRISTO SANTOS, JUAN VASQUEZ, SELVIN CARDOZA, JESSICA ITURBE JAIME, MARIA DE LOS ANGELES ARAIZA, MARIA DE JESUS ARAIZA, EMA ORTIZ, LUIS CARLOS ESPINOZA-LOPEZ, JULIO ARREGUIN, AVARO NUNEZ, ALEJANDRO ARAIZA, JOSE CASTILLO, MARIA L. SOLIS, NOHELIA JIMENEZ, ELIZABETH PADILLA, MA. DEL ROSARIO URENA, NORA G. GONZALEZ, HUGO A PACHECO, SONIA LOPEZ, RUBEN PADILLA, ADRIANA PADILLA, JANET VALERA, NANCY RAMIREZ, OSBALDO VELEZ, JORGE RUBALCAVA GALINDO, BEATRIZ MANRIQUEZ, ALEJANDRO GARCIA, CLAUDIA OROZCO MOLINA, JOSE M. VELASQUEZ, and JUAN DE DIOS MUNOZ GONZALEZ, Plaintiffs, v. JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, the Honorable Governor in his official capacity as Colorado Governor, JOHN W. SUTTERS (sic), Colorado Attorney General, in his official capacity as elected Colorado Attorney General, ELIZABETH OLDHAM, in her official capacity as 14th Judicial District Attorney, MITCHELL MORRISSEY, in his official capacity as Second Judicial District Attorney, DON QUICK, in his official capacity as 17th Judicial District Attorney, CAROL CHAMBERS, in her official capacity as 18th Judicial District Attorney, RODNEY JOHNSON, in his official capacity as elected Grand County Sheriff, TED MINK, in his official capacity as elected Jefferson County Sheriff, FRANK THOMAS, in his official capacity as Sheriff, SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, in its official capacity, DOUGLAS N. DARR, in his official capacity as elected Adams County Sheriff, TOM DELAND, in his official capacity as Broomfield Chief of Police, Defendants. ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION 2 Before the Court is Plaintiff Alfonso Carrillo’s “Unpossed”1 Motion for an Order to Authorize Plaintiff’s Law Library and Storage Privileges as Pro-Se Litigant [filed November 29, 2012; docket #81]. To the extent the motion seeks clarification that Mr. Carrillo currently proceeds in this case as a pro se Plaintiff, the record reveals that Mr. Carrillo is, indeed, currently proceeding in this matter without an attorney, and the motion is granted to provide such clarification. Otherwise, all other requests for relief are denied. DATED this 3rd day of December, 2012, in Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: Michael E. Hegarty United States Magistrate Judge 1 To the extent that Mr. Carrillo intended to write “unopposed,” the Court notes that the motion provides no certification that Mr. Carrillo attempted to contact Defendants in this case for their position on the motion; in fact, no Defendants have yet appeared in this case. The Court warns Mr. Carrillo and all Plaintiffs that no motion shall be characterized as “opposed” or “unopposed” unless the Plaintiffs certify they have conferred with Defendants for their positions on such motion. See D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1. 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?