Carty-Mauk v. Custer County, Board of County Commissioners et al
Filing
50
ORDER granting 49 Motion to Dismiss Vining Defendants. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Daniel L. Vining and Shirley A. Vining are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each of the affected parties to pay its own attorney fees and costs; and defendants Daniel L. Vining and Shirley A. Vining are DROPPED as named parties to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/16/13. (kfinn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02117-REB-KLM
CHRISTINA CARTY-MAUK, as the Mother and Next Friend of B.C., a Minor Child,
Plaintiff,
v.
LINDA ELLIOTT, in her individual capacity,
LEOKADIA ANN FREEMAN,
DANIEL L. VINING, and
SHIRLEY A. VINING,
Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO
DEFENDANTS DANIEL L. VINING AND SHIRLEY A. VINING, ONLY
Blackburn,
The matter before me is the Stipulation To Dismiss Vining Defendants [#49]1
filed April 16, 2013. After reviewing the notice and the record I conclude that the notice
should be approved and that plaintiff’s claims against defendants Daniel L. Vining and
Shirley A. Vining should be dismissed with prejudice.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulation To Dismiss Vining Defendants [#49] filed April 16,
2013, is APPROVED;
2. That plaintiff’s claims against defendants Daniel L. Vining and Shirley A.
1
“[#49]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.
Vining are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each of the affected parties to pay its
own attorney fees and costs; and
3. That defendants Daniel L. Vining and Shirley A. Vining are DROPPED as
named parties to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly.
Dated April 16, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?