Driessen v. Home Loan State Bank
Filing
6
SECOND ORDER Directing Plaintiff To Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 09/04/12. (nmmsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02220-BNB
ROCHELLE DRIESSEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
HOME LOAN STATE BANK,
Defendant.
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES
Ms. Driessen has submitted a Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 on the court-approved form, as directed in the August 21,
2012 Order Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies. However, the affidavit is incomplete.
The affidavit submitted indicates that Plaintiff receives a monthly income of $1,492.00
and that her monthly expenses total $812.00, leaving a remainder of
$680.00, which would allow her to pay the $350.00 filing fee. However, because
Plaintiff has not fully completed the section titled “Financial Obligations,” the Court will
give her one final opportunity to do so. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Plaintiff cure the deficiency designated above within twentyone (21) days from the date of this order. Any papers which the Plaintiff files in
response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall obtain the court-approved Motion
and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 form, along with the
applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that, if the Plaintiff fails to submit an amended Motion and
Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 within thirty (30) days
from the date of this order, she will be denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
will be ordered to pay the $350.00 filing fee if she wishes to pursue her claims in this
action.
DATED September 4, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?