Maunz v. Colorado Court of Appeal's
Filing
28
MINUTE ORDER granting 26 Motion to Stay of Proceedings/Stay of Execution Order, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/15/2013.(skl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02225-BNB
WILLIAM A. MAUNZ,
Applicant,
v.
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS,
Respondent.
MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND
This matter is before the court on the “Motion for Stay of Proceedings/Stay of
Execution of Order” (ECF No. 26) and the document titled “Amended Complaint for Writ
of Habeas Corpus Title 28 § 2241, Amended Pleading 28 § 2254, Stay” (ECF No. 27)
filed by Applicant on January 14, 2013. The court construes the “Motion for Stay of
Proceedings/Stay of Execution” (ECF No. 26) as a motion for an extension of time to file
an amended pleading as directed in the court’s Order Directing Applicant to File
Amended Pleading (ECF No. 22) entered in this action on December 14, 2012. The
liberally construed motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 26) is GRANTED and
Applicant shall have up to and including February 15, 2013, to file an amended
pleading as directed. Applicant is reminded that, if he wishes to pursue any habeas
corpus claims in this action, he must file an amended pleading on the proper form that
has been provided to him and he must clarify the federal constitutional claims he is
asserting. The document titled “Amended Complaint for Writ of Habeas Corpus Title 28
§ 2241, Amended Pleading 28 § 2254, Stay” (ECF No. 27) is not on the proper form and
does not clarify the claims Applicant wishes to assert.
Dated: January 15, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?