EdiSync Systems, LLC v. Adobe Systems, Inc.

Filing 102

ORDER granting 100 [Fourth] Joint Motion to Revise [and supplement] the Supplemental Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/9/15.(dkals, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02231-MSK-MEH
EDISYNC SYSTEMS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
ORDER ON [FOURTH] JOINT MOTION TO REVISE THE
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULING ORDER

The [Fourth] Joint Motion to Revise [and supplement] the Supplemental Scheduling
Order [filed February 6, 2015; docket #100] is granted. For good cause shown, paragraph 8 of
the Supplemental Scheduling Order in this case (docket #69), as modified by Order of this Court
on November 11, 2014 (docket #77), January 9, 2015 (docket #89), and January 26, 2015
(docket #96) shall be revised and supplemented as follows:
Description
Deadline for Adobe to make prior art and
contention elections
8.e. Deadline [for EdiSync] to serve Response to
Invalidity Contentions and Claim Chart[s]
8.k Deadline to file simultaneous Responses to
opening Claim Construction briefs and all
supporting evidence
8.l Deadline to file simultaneous reply briefs in
support of Claim Construction briefs not to
exceed 10 pages

1

Deadline
February 13, 2015
March 27, 2015
February 20, 2015

March 10, 2015

Description
Deadline to for EdiSync to supplement its
infringement contentions
Deadline for Adobe to supplement its invalidity
contentions

Deadline
April 3, 2015
May 15, 2015

All other aspects of the Supplemental Scheduling Order remain the same.
Dated at Denver, Colorado this 9th day of February, 2015.
BY THE COURT:

Michael E. Hegarty
United States Magistrate Judge

2