EdiSync Systems, LLC v. Adobe Systems, Inc.

Filing 102

ORDER granting 100 [Fourth] Joint Motion to Revise [and supplement] the Supplemental Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/9/15.(dkals, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-02231-MSK-MEH EDISYNC SYSTEMS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, Defendant. ORDER ON [FOURTH] JOINT MOTION TO REVISE THE SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULING ORDER The [Fourth] Joint Motion to Revise [and supplement] the Supplemental Scheduling Order [filed February 6, 2015; docket #100] is granted. For good cause shown, paragraph 8 of the Supplemental Scheduling Order in this case (docket #69), as modified by Order of this Court on November 11, 2014 (docket #77), January 9, 2015 (docket #89), and January 26, 2015 (docket #96) shall be revised and supplemented as follows: Description Deadline for Adobe to make prior art and contention elections 8.e. Deadline [for EdiSync] to serve Response to Invalidity Contentions and Claim Chart[s] 8.k Deadline to file simultaneous Responses to opening Claim Construction briefs and all supporting evidence 8.l Deadline to file simultaneous reply briefs in support of Claim Construction briefs not to exceed 10 pages 1 Deadline February 13, 2015 March 27, 2015 February 20, 2015 March 10, 2015 Description Deadline to for EdiSync to supplement its infringement contentions Deadline for Adobe to supplement its invalidity contentions Deadline April 3, 2015 May 15, 2015 All other aspects of the Supplemental Scheduling Order remain the same. Dated at Denver, Colorado this 9th day of February, 2015. BY THE COURT: Michael E. Hegarty United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?