EdiSync Systems, LLC v. Adobe Systems, Inc.

Filing 150

MINUTE ORDER granting 148 [Eighth] Joint Motion to Revise [and supplement] the Supplemental Scheduling Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/22/2016.(slibi, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02231-MSK-MEH
EDISYNC SYSTEMS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on January 22, 2016.
The [Eighth] Joint Motion to Revise [and supplement] the Supplemental Scheduling
Order [filed January 20, 2016; docket #148] is granted as follows. For good cause shown,
paragraph 8 of the Supplemental Scheduling Order in this case (docket #69), as modified by
Order of this Court on November 11, 2014 (docket #77), January 9, 2015 (docket #89), January
26, 2015 (docket #96), February 10, 2015 (docket #102), March 27, 2015 (docket #113), July 9,
2015 (docket #120), and September 22, 2015 (#128), shall be revised and supplemented as
follows:
Description
Deadline for EdiSync to reduce the number of
asserted claims to eight

1

Deadline
45 days after the
Court’s ruling on
claim construction

Description
Deadline for Adobe to make prior ant and
contention elections
[Adobe will rely on: (a) no more than eight
separate references that may be used against any
claim limitation, not including references
applied solely against the claims’ “MPM”
limitation (hereafter “MPM references”),
wherein documents relating to “system”
references collectively count as a single
reference; (b) no more than seven additional
MPM references, and these MPM references will
not be used for any other claim limitation; and
(c) no more than nine different combinations of
the above references.]
Expert Witness Disclosure:
The parties shall designate all affirmative
experts and provide opposing counsel and any
pro se parties with all information specified in
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2). [The parties anticipate
providing expert testimony in the fields of
liability and damages. The parties are limited to
three experts per side.]
The parties shall designate all rebuttal experts
and provide opposing counsel and any pro se
party with all information specified in Fed. R.
Civ. P. 26(a)(2).
Expert Discovery Deadline

Dispositive Motions Deadline

Deadline
60 days after the
Court’s ruling on
claim construction

75 days after the
Court’s ruling on
claim construction

28 days after
service of
affirmative expert
reports
21 days after
service of rebuttal
expert reports
45 days after
service of rebuttal
expert reports

All other aspects of the Supplemental Scheduling Order remain the same.

2

Dated at Denver, Colorado this 22nd day of January, 2016.
BY THE COURT:

Michael E. Hegarty
United States Magistrate Judge

3