Carbajal v. St. Anthony Central Hospital et al

Filing 283

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 281 Joint Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Responses. The Motion is denied to the extent that the Medical Defendants seek to have Plaintiff's Responses stricken. The Motion is granted to the extent that the Medical Defendants seek an extension of time in which to file a Reply. Replies due by 1/15/2015. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/18/2014. (alowe)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02257-REB-KLM
DEAN CARBAJAL,
Plaintiff,
v.
ST. ANTHONY CENTRAL HOSPITAL, a corporation,
CENTURA HEALTH, a corporation,
STEPHAN M. SWAN, Physician Assistant, in his official and individual capacities,
GREGORY J. ENGLUND, Registered Nurse, in his official and individual capacities,
MARCI L. HANSUE, Registered Nurse, in her official and individual capacities,
MICHAEL O’NEILL, Police Officer for the Denver Police Department, in his official and
individual capacities,
JAY LOPEZ, Police Officer for the Denver Police Department, in his official and individual
capacities,
LARRY BLACK, Police Officer for the Denver Police Department, in his official and
individual capacities, and
APEX, a corporation,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on the Medical Defendants’ Joint Motion to Strike
Plaintiff’s Summary Judgment Responses [#281] (the “Motion”).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#281] is DENIED in part, DENIED
without prejudice in part, and GRANTED in part. The Motion is denied to the extent
that the Medical Defendants seek to have Plaintiff’s Responses [#272, #273, #274, #276]
stricken. The Motion is denied without prejudice to the extent the Medical Defendants
seek to strike certain claims referenced by Plaintiff in his Responses that are not a part of
the Amended Complaint. This issue may be raised in Defendants’ Replies in support of
their Motions for Summary Judgment. Finally, the Motion is granted to the extent that the
Medical Defendants seek an extension of time in which to file a Reply. Accordingly,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for all Defendants to file Replies in
-1-

support of their Motions for Summary Judgment is extended to January 15, 2015.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the page limit for each of Defendants’ Replies is
extended by 5 pages to 15 pages.

Dated: December 18, 2014

-2-