Pipkins v. Taillon

Filing 66

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/28/14. Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Notice (Doc. 47) or, in the Alternative, Find That It Supports Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 43) [#48] and Plaintiff's Motion for Production of Video Camera Footage [#60] are DENIED as moot.(lgale)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02275-REB-KLM
ROBERT PIPKINS,
Plaintiff,
v.
RYAN TAILLON,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Notice
(Doc. 47) or, in the Alternative, Find That It Supports Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. 43) [#48]1 (the “First Motion”) and Plaintiff’s Motion for
Production of Video Camera Footage [#60] (the “Second Motion”).
On July 24, 2014, the Court entered its Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge [#65] (the “Recommendation”) regarding Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment [#43] in which the Court recommended that the motion for summary
judgment be granted and discussed the consideration given to Plaintiff’s untitled document
that serves as Plaintiff’s response [#47] to the motion for summary judgment. See
Recommendation [#65] at 16-17. Ultimately, the Court recommended that Plaintiff’s claim
against Defendant be dismissed without prejudice. Id. at 19. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the First Motion [#48] and the Second Motion [#60]
are DENIED as moot.2
Dated: July 28, 2014

1

“[#48]” is an example of the convention the Court uses to identify the docket number
assigned to a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system
(CM/ECF). This convention is used throughout this Minute Order.
2

The Court may rule on a pending motion at any time. D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(d).