Barron v. Bent County Correctional Facility et al
Filing
25
ORDER for Service of 24 Second Amended Complaint filed by Jacinto Barron. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 2/15/13. (dkals, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02278-PAB-CBS
JACINTO BARRON,
Plaintiff,
v.
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant.
ORDER FOR SERVICE OF SECOND AMENDED PRISONER COMPLAINT
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
This civil action is before the court for service of the Second Amended Prisoner
Complaint (Doc. # 24) on Defendant Colorado Department of Corrections. Pursuant to
the Order Referring Case dated August 28, 2012 (Doc. # 9), this case was referred to
the Magistrate Judge. On January 18, 2012, Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in
forma pauperis. (See Doc. # 4). On January 18, 2013, Plaintiff filed his Second
Amended Prisoner Complaint naming the Colorado Department of Corrections as the
only Defendant. (See Doc. # 24). It is now
ORDERED that, as appropriate, the Clerk of the Court shall attempt to obtain a
waiver of service from Defendant Colorado Department of Corrections, 2862 South
Circle, Colorado Springs, CO 80906. If the Clerk is unable to do so, the United States
Marshal shall serve a copy of the Second Amended Prisoner Complaint (Doc. # 24) and
summons upon Defendant Colorado Department of Corrections. If appropriate, the
Marshal shall first attempt to obtain a waiver of service of these documents pursuant to
1
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that after service of process, Defendant Colorado
Department of Corrections shall respond to the Second Amended Prisoner Complaint
as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Dated at Denver, Colorado this 15th day of February, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Craig B. Shaffer
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?