Barron v. Bent County Correctional Facility et al

Filing 25

ORDER for Service of 24 Second Amended Complaint filed by Jacinto Barron. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 2/15/13. (dkals, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-02278-PAB-CBS JACINTO BARRON, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant. ORDER FOR SERVICE OF SECOND AMENDED PRISONER COMPLAINT Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer This civil action is before the court for service of the Second Amended Prisoner Complaint (Doc. # 24) on Defendant Colorado Department of Corrections. Pursuant to the Order Referring Case dated August 28, 2012 (Doc. # 9), this case was referred to the Magistrate Judge. On January 18, 2012, Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (See Doc. # 4). On January 18, 2013, Plaintiff filed his Second Amended Prisoner Complaint naming the Colorado Department of Corrections as the only Defendant. (See Doc. # 24). It is now ORDERED that, as appropriate, the Clerk of the Court shall attempt to obtain a waiver of service from Defendant Colorado Department of Corrections, 2862 South Circle, Colorado Springs, CO 80906. If the Clerk is unable to do so, the United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the Second Amended Prisoner Complaint (Doc. # 24) and summons upon Defendant Colorado Department of Corrections. If appropriate, the Marshal shall first attempt to obtain a waiver of service of these documents pursuant to 1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. It is FURTHER ORDERED that after service of process, Defendant Colorado Department of Corrections shall respond to the Second Amended Prisoner Complaint as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dated at Denver, Colorado this 15th day of February, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/ Craig B. Shaffer United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?