Montoya v. Newman et al

Filing 91

MINUTE ORDER granting 89 Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Discovery for Limited Purposes Related to Evidence of Spoliation. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/15/2014.(klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-02362-REB-KLM RAYMOND MONTOYA, Plaintiff, v. BRUCE NEWMAN, in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Huerfano County Jail, LARRY GARBISO, DOE #1, 2 - detention center officer at Huerfano County Jail, DOE #1-2, medical staff member at Huerfano County Jail, and CHARLES NEECE, M.D., Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Reopen Discovery for Limited Purposes Related to Evidence of Spoliation [#89]1 (the “Motion”). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#89] is GRANTED.2 Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that discovery is reopened for the limited purpose of allowing Plaintiff to take discovery regarding his allegation of spoliation of evidence. On or before June 2, 2014, Plaintiff may take the following discovery: (1) up to 7 hours of total deposition testimony, (2) service of one third-party subpoena, and (3) service of one request for production on Defendant Newman. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Newman’s response to the request for production shall be served on Plaintiff on or before five business days after the date of service of the request for production on Defendant Newman. Dated: May 15, 2014 1 “[#89]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this Minute Order. 2 The Court may rule on a pending motion at any time. D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(d).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?