High v. JIK, Inc.,et al.,

Filing 44

ORDER: 33 MOTION to Compel Mandatory Rule 26 (A)(1) Initial Disclosures from Defendants is DENIED as moot; 40 Motion to Restrict Access is GRANTED. Supplement to Scheduling Order due by 1/11/13. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/4/13. (bnbcd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02373-BNB
MAKYNNA HIGH,
Plaintiff,
v.
JIK, INC., a Colorado corporation, d/b/a Denny’s Restaurant,
JUN KIM, and
DAN BYRNES,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on the following:
(1)

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Mandatory Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures

from Defendants [Doc. # 33, filed 11/29/1012] (the “Motion to Compel”); and
(2)

Plaintiff’s Motion for Forthwith Issuance of a Protective Order to Protect

Personal Identity Information [Doc. # 40, filed 12/11/2012] (the “Motion to Restrict Access”).
I held a hearing on the motions this morning and made rulings on the record, which are
incorporated here.
IT IS ORDERED:
(1)

The Motion to Compel [Doc. # 33] is DENIED as moot;

(2)

The Motion to Restrict Access [Doc. # 40] is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court

is directed to RESTRICT ACCESS to Doc. # 36-2 at Level 1. On or before January 11, 2013,
the defendants shall file a substitute Doc. # 36-2 with all confidential and sensitive information
redacted; and

(3)

On or before January 11, 2013, the defendants shall supplement the Scheduling

Order [Doc. # 26] with their statement of defenses.
Dated January 4, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge

2