High v. JIK, Inc.,et al.,

Filing 92

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE re: 91 Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice. The action is dismissed, with prejudice, each party to pay his, her, or its own attorneys fees and expenses. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/3/13. (mnfsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02373-BNB-KLM
MAKYNNA HIGH,
Plaintiff,
v.
JIK, INC., a Colorado corporation, d/b/a Denny’s Restaurant,
JUN KIM, and
DAN BYRNES,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice [Doc. # 91,
filed 12/2/2013] (the “Stipulation”). Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Fed. R. Civ. P., allows parties to
dismiss a case “without a court order” by filing a “stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties
who have appeared.” Here, however, the parties’ Stipulation specifically requests an order
dismissing the action, with prejudice, with each party to pay his, her, or its own attorneys fees
and expenses. Good cause has been shown.
IT IS ORDERED that the action is dismissed, with prejudice, each party to pay his, her,
or its own attorneys fees and expenses.
Dated December 3, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge