Diversatex, Inc. v. Northwest Art Mall, Inc. et al
Filing
23
PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 12/18/12. (cbssec)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-CV-02416-REB-CBS
DIVERSATEX, INC., d/b/a
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONCEPTS,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
NORTHWEST ART MALL, INC.,
an Oregon corporation, and WILKES PETTYJOHN, an individual.
Defendants.
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), and upon a showing of good cause in support
of the entry of a Protective Order to protect the production, discovery, and dissemination
of confidential information and/or sensitive financial data, records, or accounts in the
possession or control of Plaintiff Diversatex, Inc. d/b/a Rocky Mountain Concepts
(“Plaintiff”)
and
Defendants
Northwest
Art
Mall,
Inc.
and
Wilkes
Pettyjohn
(“Defendants”), with the Plaintiff and Defendants collectively referred to herein as the
Parties”, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1.
This Protective Order shall apply to all Documents produced by the
Parties in discovery pursuant to the discovery duties created by the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure.
2.
Based on the representations of the Parties, the Court finds that discovery
in this case is likely to involve information that is confidential because it contains
sensitive financial and proprietary information. Further, the public release of certain
information may interfere with, or injure, the Parties ongoing operation of their
respective businesses. Accordingly, the Court finds that it is appropriate and necessary
to enter this Protective Order to facilitate discovery while protecting the confidential
nature of information where appropriate and necessary.
3.
As used in this Protective Order, “Document” and “Documents” shall mean
all Documents and electronically stored information produced in discovery of this action.
The term document includes all things within the scope of Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a). A draft
or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning of this term.
4.
If counsel for one of the Parties has reviewed the information to be
disclosed in discovery and believes, in good faith pursuant to the standards set forth in
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), that the information is confidential or otherwise is entitled to
protection, it may be designated CONFIDENTIAL by marking the documents
“CONFIDENTIAL” (collectively, “Confidential Information”).
5.
Confidential Information shall not be disclosed or used for any purpose
except the preparation and trial of this case.
Confidential Information may not be
disclosed to anyone other than those persons designated in Paragraph 7 below, except
by express written agreement of the party who produced such Confidential Information
or by order of the Court. The protections granted by this Protective Order shall not be
waived.
6.
Confidential Information may be reproduced for litigation management
purposes only. Electronically reproduced Confidential Information must retain the mark
-2-
“CONFIDENTIAL” and should also contain a document control designation unique to
the producing party.
7.
The receiving party shall not disclose Confidential Information to any
person, except that such information may be disclosed to:
(a)
The Parties’ officers, directors, members, legal counsel and staff
members directly involved in this case and attorneys actively working
on this case;
(b)
persons regularly employed or associated with the attorneys actively
working on the case, whose assistance is required by said attorneys in
the preparation for trial, at trial, or at other proceedings in this case;
(c)
expert witnesses and consultants retained in connection with this
proceeding, and the administrative staff of such experts, to the extent
such disclosure is necessary for preparation, trial or other proceedings
in this case;
(d)
(e)
the Court, and necessary Court staff; and
(f)
8.
witnesses in preparation for or during any deposition, hearing or trial;
other persons by written agreement of the Parties.
Prior to disclosing any Confidential Information to any person listed in
Paragraphs 7(a), (b), (c), and (f), counsel for the disclosing party shall provide such
person with a copy of this Protective Order and obtain from such person a written
acknowledgment stating that he or she has read this Protective Order and agrees to be
bound by its provisions. All such acknowledgments shall be retained by counsel and
-3-
shall be subject to in camera review by the Court should it become necessary to review
compliance with this Protective Order.
9.
Notwithstanding the provisions of this Protective Order, nothing in this
Protective Order shall:
(a)
Limit a Party’s use or disclosure of its own Confidential Information;
(b)
Prevent disclosure of Confidential Information with the written consent
of counsel for the producing Party;
(c)
Apply to information in the public domain or obtained from sources
other than discovery in this Litigation regardless of whether such
information is also contained in Confidential Information;
(d)
Apply to Confidential Information disclosed in any exhibit list filed in
preparation for trial or introduced into evidence or for purposes of
impeachment at trial.
10.
Whenever a deposition involves the disclosure of Confidential Information,
the deposition or portions thereof shall be designated as Confidential and shall be
subject to the provisions of this Protective Order. Such designation may be made on
the record during the deposition, but any party may also designate portions of
depositions as Confidential after transcription, provided written notice of the designation
is promptly given to all counsel of record within thirty days after notice by the court
reporter of the completion of the transcript.
11.
In the event that the Parties (or any Party) desire to use Confidential
Information as an exhibit to a Court document, not including depositions, the
-4-
Confidential Information shall be filed under seal in accordance with D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.2
and District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing Procedure VI.A.2, and must retain the
mark “CONFIDENTIAL” with the unique document control stamp of the producing Party.
12.
Any Party may object to the designation of particular information as
CONFIDENTIAL by giving written notice to counsel for the Party designating the
disputed information.
The written notice shall identify the information to which the
objection is made and the basis for any challenge to the designation. If the Parties
cannot resolve the objection within fourteen business days after the time the notice is
received, the Party designating the disputed information as CONFIDENTIAL shall make
an appropriate motion pursuant to Magistrate Judge Shaffer’s discovery dispute
procedures (as provided for in the Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order filed on 11/28/2012
in this case at Doc. 17 and incorporated herein by this reference) requesting that the
Court determine whether the disputed information should be subject to the terms of this
Protective Order.
In connection with a motion filed under this provision, the Party
designating the information as CONFIDENTIAL shall bear the burden of establishing
that good cause exists for the disputed information to be treated as CONFIDENTIAL.
The disputed information shall be treated as CONFIDENTIAL under the terms of this
Protective Order until the Court rules on the motion. If the Party designating disputed
information as CONFIDENTIAL fails to make such a motion within fourteen business
days after receiving the written notice, the disputed information shall no longer be
considered Confidential Information under the terms of this Protective Order.
-5-
13.
The termination of this action shall not relieve counsel or other persons
obligated hereunder from their responsibility to maintain the confidentiality of
Confidential Information pursuant to this Protective Order, and the Court shall retain
continuing jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Protective Order.
14.
Within 45 days of the conclusion of this case by dismissal with prejudice,
entry of judgment disposing of all issues and claims, and/or the termination of any
appeal or time to file an appeal, unless other arrangements are agreed in writing by the
Parties, each Document, including all copies (electronic and physical) thereof which
have been designated by a Party as Confidential shall be returned to that Party or
destroyed. This obligation to return or destroy Confidential Documents shall apply to all
persons who receive Confidential Documents pursuant to Paragraph 7, above. Within
60 days of the conclusion of the case, any party receiving Confidential Information shall,
upon notice, provide counsel for the producing Party with written confirmation of its
compliance with this provision.
15.
By agreeing to the entry of this Protective Order, the Parties adopt no
position as to the authenticity or admissibility of the documents produced subject to it.
16.
This Protective Order may be modified by the Court at any time for good
cause shown following notice to all Parties and an opportunity for them to be heard.
-6-
DATED at Denver, Colorado, on December 18, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/Craig B. Shaffer
Craig B. Shaffer
United States Magistrate Judge
APPROVED:
s/ Sean M. Hanlon
Jonathan S. Bender
Sean M. Hanlon
Holland & Hart LLP
Post Office Box 8749
Denver, Colorado 80201-8749
Phone: (303) 295-8000
Fax: (303) 295-8261
Email: jsbender@hollandhart.com;
smhanlon@hollandhart.com
Attorneys for Defendants
s/ David M. Hollar
David M. Hollar
David M. Hollar, PLLC
161 Washington Street
Conshohocken, PA 19428
dhollar@villarilaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
5890800_1.DOCX
-7-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?