Garrett v. United States Postal Service et al

Filing 15

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT J&K PROFESSIONAL CLEANERS, INC., ONLY re: 14 Stipulation of Dismissal of Party filed by J & K Professional Cleaners, Inc. Plaintiff's claims against defendant J&K Professional Cleaners, Inc. are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/18/12. (kfinn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 12-cv-02427-REB JAN GARRETT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC. J&K PROFESSIONAL CLEANERS, INC., and JOE VILLANO, Defendants. ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT J&K PROFESSIONAL CLEANERS, INC., ONLY Blackburn J. The matter before me is the Stipulation For Dismissal Without Prejudice of Defendant J&K Professional Cleaners, Inc. [#14]1 filed October 18, 2012. After reviewing the stipulation and the record, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved and that plaintiff’s claims against defendant J&K Professional Cleaners, Inc. should be dismissed without prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulation For Dismissal Without Prejudice of Defendant J&K Professional Cleaners, Inc. [#14] filed October 18, 2012, is APPROVED; 1 “[#14]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 2. That plaintiff’s claims against defendant J&K Professional Cleaners, Inc. are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with each of the affected parties to pay its own attorney fees and costs; and 3. That defendant J&K Professional Cleaners, Inc. is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. Dated October 18, 2012, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?