Westervelt v. Encompass Insurance Company
Filing
16
MINUTE ORDER granting 14 Amended Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 5/20/2013, Dispositive Motions due by 6/20/2013. Final Pretrial Conference reset to 9/3/2013 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, Proposed Pretrial Order due by 8/27/2013. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/20/13.(bnbcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02441-CMA-BNB
GEORGE K. WESTERVELT,
Plaintiff,
v.
ENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s Amended Unopposed Motion to
Amend Scheduling Order [docket no. 14, filed February 19, 2013] (the “Motion”).
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The parties shall designate all rebuttal
experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)
on or before April 20, 2013. The discovery cut-off is extended to and including May 20, 2013.
The dispositive motions deadline is extended to and including June 20, 2013.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Pretrial Conference set for July 11, 2013, is
vacated and reset to September 3, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom A-401, Fourth Floor,
Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294. The
proposed Pretrial Order, submitted pursuant to District of Colorado ECF Procedures V.5.1, is
due on or before August 27, 2013. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Alfred
A. Arraj United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See
D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2B.
DATED: February 20, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?