Harris v. Bowlen et al.
Filing
53
AMENDED ORDER. ORDERED that Marquise D. Harris's Motion To Dismiss 49 is GRANTED, and the above captioned case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ORDERED that Marquise D. Harris's Motion For Recusal 48 , is DENIED AS MOOT. ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion To Dismiss The Amended Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) And 12(b)(6) 32 , is DENIED AS MOOT by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 03/18/13. (jjhsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02534-WYD-MJW
MARQUISE D. HARRIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
PAT BOWLEN (in his individual and official capacity), and,
DENVER BRONCOS FOOTBALL ORGANIZATION (in its official and individual
capacity),
Defendants.
AMENDED ORDER
In light of plaintiff, Marquise D. Harris’s, Objection To Dismissal Of Complaint
With Prejudice [ECF No. 52], filed on March 18, 2013, it is
ORDERED that Marquise D. Harris’s Motion To Dismiss [ECF No. 49] is
GRANTED, and the above captioned case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Marquise D. Harris’s Motion For Recusal [ECF No.
48], filed on March 6, 2013, is DENIED AS MOOT. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss The Amended
Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) And 12(b)(6) [ECF No. 32], filed on December
19, 2012, is DENIED AS MOOT.
-1-
Dated: March 18, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Senior U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?