Harris v. Bowlen et al.

Filing 53

AMENDED ORDER. ORDERED that Marquise D. Harris's Motion To Dismiss 49 is GRANTED, and the above captioned case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ORDERED that Marquise D. Harris's Motion For Recusal 48 , is DENIED AS MOOT. ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion To Dismiss The Amended Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) And 12(b)(6) 32 , is DENIED AS MOOT by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 03/18/13. (jjhsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 12-cv-02534-WYD-MJW MARQUISE D. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. PAT BOWLEN (in his individual and official capacity), and, DENVER BRONCOS FOOTBALL ORGANIZATION (in its official and individual capacity), Defendants. AMENDED ORDER In light of plaintiff, Marquise D. Harris’s, Objection To Dismissal Of Complaint With Prejudice [ECF No. 52], filed on March 18, 2013, it is ORDERED that Marquise D. Harris’s Motion To Dismiss [ECF No. 49] is GRANTED, and the above captioned case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Marquise D. Harris’s Motion For Recusal [ECF No. 48], filed on March 6, 2013, is DENIED AS MOOT. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss The Amended Complaint Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) And 12(b)(6) [ECF No. 32], filed on December 19, 2012, is DENIED AS MOOT. -1- Dated: March 18, 2013. BY THE COURT: /s/ Wiley Y. Daniel Wiley Y. Daniel Senior U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?