Pioneer Centres Holding Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust, The v. Alerus Financial, N.A. et al

Filing 259

ORDER denying as moot 253 Motion to Strike. Granting 255 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, and Plaintiffs' responses to the Motions for Summary Judgment and Motions in Limine filed by Defendants Berenbaum Weinshienk, P.C. and Alerus Financial, N.A., as set forth in paragraph two of Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike or Limit 253 , shall be due on or before June 2, 2014, by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 5/9/2014.(trlee, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02547-RM-BNB
THE PIONEER CENTRES HOLDING COMPANY
EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN AND TRUST
AND ITS TRUSTEES, MATTHEW BREWER,
ROBERT JENSEN AND SUSAN DUKES,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ALERUS FINANCIAL, N.A. and
BERENBAUM WEINSHIENK, P.C.,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ALERUS FINANCIAL, N.A.,
Third-Party Plaintiff and Counterclaim Plaintiff,
v.
MATTHEW BREWER, ROBERT JENSEN,
SUSAN DUKES, PIONEER CENTRES HOLDING COMPANY,
and RICHARD EASON,
Third-Party Defendants and Counterclaim Defendants.
ORDER
GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MODIFIED AND UNOPPOSED MOTION (ECF NO. 255)
AND DENYING, AS MOOT, PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE OR LIMIT
(ECF NO. 253)
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Modified and Unopposed Motion
for Enlargement of Time to File Responses to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment and
in Limine and Withdrawal of Motion to Strike or Limit Such Motions” (“Motion”). (ECF No.

255.) Upon consideration of the Motion, finding good cause for the requested enlargement of
time, and being otherwise fully advised, it is
ORDERED that the Motion (ECF No. 255) is GRANTED and Plaintiffs’ responses to the
Motions for Summary Judgment and Motions in Limine filed by Defendants Berenbaum
Weinshienk, P.C. and Alerus Financial, N.A., as set forth in paragraph two of Plaintiffs’ Motion
to Strike or Limit (ECF No. 253), shall be due on or before June 2, 2014; and
FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with Plaintiffs’ request to withdraw,
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike or Limit (ECF No. 253) is DENIED as moot.
DATED this 9th day of May, 2014.
BY THE COURT:

____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge

2