Barrows v. Astrue
Filing
27
ORDER: Motion For Stipulated Fees Under The Equal Access To JusticeAct [# 26 ] is granted. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 9/3/2013. (klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02568-REB
TRACY L. BARROWS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on the Motion For Stipulated Fees Under The Equal
Access To Justice Act [#26]1 filed August 29, 2013. After reviewing the motion and
the record, I conclude that the motion should be granted.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Motion For Stipulated Fees Under The Equal Access To Justice
Act [#26] filed August 29, 2013, is GRANTED;
2. That defendant SHALL PAY plaintiff a total of $6,324.61 in EAJA fees and
expenses; provided that this amount is payable to plaintiff, not directly to her counsel;
1
“[#26]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.
3. That payment SHALL BE MAILED to plaintiff in care of her attorney at his
office:
William Viner, Esq.
Sawaya, Rose, McClure & White, P.C.
1600 Odgen Street
Denver, Colorado 80128;
4. That defendant’s payment of this amount BARS any and all claims plaintiff
may have relating to EAJA fees and expenses in connection with this action;
5. That defendant’s payment of this amount IS WITHOUT PREJUDICE to
plaintiff’s right to seek attorney fees under section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA; and
6. That this order SHALL NOT BE CITED as precedent in any other case.
Dated September 3, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?