Barrows v. Astrue

Filing 27

ORDER: Motion For Stipulated Fees Under The Equal Access To JusticeAct [# 26 ] is granted. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 9/3/2013. (klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 12-cv-02568-REB TRACY L. BARROWS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER Blackburn, J. The matter is before me on the Motion For Stipulated Fees Under The Equal Access To Justice Act [#26]1 filed August 29, 2013. After reviewing the motion and the record, I conclude that the motion should be granted. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Motion For Stipulated Fees Under The Equal Access To Justice Act [#26] filed August 29, 2013, is GRANTED; 2. That defendant SHALL PAY plaintiff a total of $6,324.61 in EAJA fees and expenses; provided that this amount is payable to plaintiff, not directly to her counsel; 1 “[#26]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 3. That payment SHALL BE MAILED to plaintiff in care of her attorney at his office: William Viner, Esq. Sawaya, Rose, McClure & White, P.C. 1600 Odgen Street Denver, Colorado 80128; 4. That defendant’s payment of this amount BARS any and all claims plaintiff may have relating to EAJA fees and expenses in connection with this action; 5. That defendant’s payment of this amount IS WITHOUT PREJUDICE to plaintiff’s right to seek attorney fees under section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA; and 6. That this order SHALL NOT BE CITED as precedent in any other case. Dated September 3, 2013, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?