Mondragon v. Camping et al
Filing
14
Final ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/29/2013. (skl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02573-BNB
RAY MONDRAGON,
Plaintiff,
v.
DOUG CAMPING,
KEVIN CAMPING, and
CAMPING COMPANIES,
Defendants.
FINAL ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, Ray Mondragon, initiated this action on September 27, 2012, by filing
pro se a Complaint (ECF No. 1). He has been granted leave to proceed pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915 based on his inability to pay the filing fee in this action.
The Court must construe the Complaint liberally because Mr. Mondragon is not
represented by an attorney. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972); Hall
v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991). However, the Court should not be
an advocate for a pro se litigant. See Hall, 935 F.2d at 1110. For the reasons stated
below, Mr. Mondragon will again be ordered to file an amended complaint.
On November 5, 2012, the Court reviewed the Complaint and determined that it
was deficient because it failed to assert a jurisdictional basis for Plaintiff’s claims. The
Court entered an order directing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days
that asserted jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question jurisdiction) or
§ 1332 (diversity jurisdiction).
Mr. Mondragon filed a “Motion to amend and assert jurisdiction, as requested”
(ECF No. 9) on December 3, 2012. In the motion, Plaintiff stated facts to show the
diversity of citizenship of the parties, but did not allege the requisite amount in
controversy under 28 U.S.C.§ 1332.
On December 10, 2012, Magistrate Judge Boland issued a second order
directing Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint that alleged sufficient facts to support
the court’s exercise of jurisdiction under the diversity of jurisdiction statute. Plaintiff was
thereafter granted an extension of time until February 11, 2013, to file his Amended
Complaint on the court-approved form in compliance with the December 10, 2012
Order. [ECF No. 12; Minute Order dated January 11, 2013]. In the January 13, 2013
Minute Order, the Court specifically told Plaintiff that if he intends to assert jurisdiction
based on the diversity jurisdiction statute, he must file an amended complaint and allege
in that pleading all the facts necessary to support jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1332. [Id.]
On January 25, 2013, Mr. Mondragon filed an “Amendmet [sic] to Complaint CV02573 and request to make this amendment part of Complaint.” [ECF No. 13]. The
amendment asserts the jurisdictional basis for Plaintiff’s claim in the Complaint.
Contrary to the Court’s previous instructions, Mr. Mondragon did not file an amended
complaint on the court-approved form and allege all facts to support jurisdiction in a
single pleading. The Court is not required to read multiple amended complaints to
determine whether Plaintiff has stated an arguable claim for relief against the
Defendants. However, because Mr. Mondragon filed his “amendment” before the
deadline imposed by the Court in the January 11, 2013 Minute Order, the Court will
2
allow him one final, brief opportunity to comply with the Court’s orders. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff, Ray Mondragon, on or before February 14, 2013, shall
file an Amended Complaint, on the court-approved Complaint form, and shall allege all
facts supporting the Court’s exercise of diversity jurisdiction. Plaintiff may obtain the
court-approved complaint form, along with the applicable instructions, at
www.cod.uscourts.gov. Alternatively, Plaintiff may obtain the Court-approved form from
the Clerks Office of the United States District Court, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado,
80294. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that, if Mr. Mondragon fails to file an amended complaint
on or before February 14, 2013, the Complaint and this action will be dismissed
without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order.
DATED January 29, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?