MacIntyre v. JP Morgan Chase Bank,NA, et al

Filing 139

AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT re: 138 , by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/20/2015. (dhans, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez Civil Action No. 12-cv-02586-WJM-MEH HOLLY MACINTYRE, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, Defendant. AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), all Orders entered during the pendency of the case, and the Order Granting In Part and Denying In Part Plaintiff’s Motion To Alter Or Amend Judgment, it is ORDERED that the Court’s Order Adopting the February 21, 2014 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and Granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 126) is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the February 21, 2014 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 117) is ADOPTED IN PART as to the Colorado River doctrine and REJECTED IN PART as to the Younger abstention doctrine. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 110) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an Amended Final Judgment is entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendant. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant is awarded costs upon the filing of a Bill of Costs with the Clerk of Court within fourteen days’ entry of Final Judgment. Dated at Denver, Colorado this 20th day of March 2015. BY THE COURT: FOR THE COURT JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK ______________________ William J. Martínez United States District Judge By: s/Deborah Hansen Deborah Hansen, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?