Christenson v. Citimortgage, Inc.

Filing 29

MINUTE ORDER granting 27 Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and to Amend the Scheduling Order, and staying discovery in this matter, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/4/13.(dkals, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-02600-CMA-KLM EUGENE CHRISTENSON, and SHARON CHRISTENSON, Plaintiffs, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and to Amend the Scheduling Order [Docket No. 27; Filed May 28, 2013] (the “Motion”). On January 14, 2013, the Court held a Scheduling Conference and entered a Scheduling Order to govern this matter [#18]. On January 23, 2013, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [#20]. On February 11, 2013, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss [#23] that is pending before the undersigned. The Motion was fully briefed on March 21, 2013. At the Scheduling Conference, the Court set a discovery deadline of September 20, 2013 and a dispositive motions deadline of October 21, 2013. In the present Motion, the parties agree that the course of the case and the scope of discovery will be determined by the Court’s ruling on the Motion to Dismiss. The parties have accordingly delayed discovery to avoid the expense of potentially unnecessary discovery but are concerned that they must soon begin to conduct discovery because of the September discovery deadline. Based on these considerations and the joint nature of the parties’ request, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#27] is GRANTED. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that discovery in this matter is STAYED until final resolution of the pending Motion to Dismiss [#23]. Dated: June 4, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?