Christenson v. Citimortgage, Inc.

Filing 63

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/20/15. Motion of Plaintiffs['] for Leave to File a Brief Surreply to Defendant's Reply (Doc. 56) in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count IV of Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 54) [#58] is DENIED as moot. (lgale, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-02600-CMA-KLM EUGENE CHRISTENSON, and SHARON CHRISTENSON, Plaintiffs, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion of Plaintiffs[’] for Leave to File a Brief Surreply to Defendant’s Reply (Doc. 56) in Support of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Count IV of Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 54) [#58] (the “Motion”). Defendant filed a Response [#60], and Plaintiffs filed a Reply [#61]. In the Reply, Plaintiffs “withdraw their request to file a separate surreply and modify their motion to request only that the Court consider” certain aspects of Watson v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., 438 S.W.3d 404 (Mo. 2014). Because Plaintiffs no longer seek to file a Surreply, and because the Court will consider Watson to whatever extent it deems necessary in resolving the Motion to Dismiss [#54], IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#58] is DENIED as moot. Dated: January 20, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?