Wyers Products Group v. Cequent Performance Products, Inc.

Filing 246

ORDER granting 245 Motion to Obtain Conventionally Filed Exhibit 10 to Wyers' Response to Motion in Limine from Court Clerk's Office by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 6/17/15.(mlace, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 12-cv-02640-REB WYERS PRODUCTS GROUP, INC. et al Plaintiffs, v. CEQUENT PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC. Defendant. ORDER RE: MOTION TO OBTAIN CONVENTIONALLY FILED EXHIBIT 10 TO WYERS’ RESPONSE TO MOTION IN LIMINE FROM COURT CLERK’S OFFICE The matter before me is plaintiffs’ Motion to Obtain Conventionally Filed Exhibit 10 to Wyers’ Response to Motion in Limine from Court Clerk’s Office [#245]1 filed June 17, 2015. After due consideration, I grant the motion. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That plaintiffs’ Motion to Obtain Conventionally Filed Exhibit 10 to Wyers’ Response to Motion in Limine from Court Clerk’s Office [#245] filed June 17, 2015, is granted; and 2. That Ms. Lorraine Labash of Holland & Knight may retrieve the prototype of the product at issue, i.e., a coupler lock, in this patent litigation (filed conventionally as [#232]2) directly from the office of the clerk of court and shall execute a receipt acknowledging receipt of the original prototype. 1 “[#245]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 2 See also Exhibit 10 [#230-10] to the response [#230]) Dated June 17, 2015, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?