Wyers Products Group v. Cequent Performance Products, Inc.
Filing
246
ORDER granting 245 Motion to Obtain Conventionally Filed Exhibit 10 to Wyers' Response to Motion in Limine from Court Clerk's Office by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 6/17/15.(mlace, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02640-REB
WYERS PRODUCTS GROUP, INC. et al
Plaintiffs,
v.
CEQUENT PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant.
ORDER RE: MOTION TO OBTAIN CONVENTIONALLY FILED EXHIBIT 10 TO
WYERS’ RESPONSE TO MOTION IN LIMINE FROM COURT CLERK’S OFFICE
The matter before me is plaintiffs’ Motion to Obtain Conventionally Filed
Exhibit 10 to Wyers’ Response to Motion in Limine from Court Clerk’s Office
[#245]1 filed June 17, 2015. After due consideration, I grant the motion.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That plaintiffs’ Motion to Obtain Conventionally Filed Exhibit 10 to Wyers’
Response to Motion in Limine from Court Clerk’s Office [#245] filed June 17, 2015,
is granted; and
2. That Ms. Lorraine Labash of Holland & Knight may retrieve the prototype of
the product at issue, i.e., a coupler lock, in this patent litigation (filed conventionally as
[#232]2) directly from the office of the clerk of court and shall execute a receipt
acknowledging receipt of the original prototype.
1
“[#245]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
2
See also Exhibit 10 [#230-10] to the response [#230])
Dated June 17, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?