Stewart et al v. Board of Trustees for Colorado School for Deaf and Blind et al

Filing 121

MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 83 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify; granting 113 Motion to Withdraw Document as oultined in the attached document. by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/26/2013.(trlee, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02664-RM-KLM
BPS, a Minor and Disabled Person
KATRINA L. STEWART, his Parent and Next Friend, and
JOHN P. STEWART, his Parent and Next Friend,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR COLORADO SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND BLIND,
COLORADO SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND BLIND,
LOUIS TUTT, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Principal for the Colorado School
for the Deaf and Blind, and
DOES 1-10, who are unknown persons,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend
Complaint [#83] (the “Motion to Amend”) and on Plaintiffs’ Motion for the Clerk of Court
to Withdraw Exhibit A to Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’ Opposed Motion to Continue
Trial Date and Modify Scheduling Order and Replace With Amended Exhibit A [#113]
(the “Motion to Withdraw”). On November 22, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Leave to
File Second Amended Complaint [#116]. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Amend [#83] is DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Withdraw [#113] is GRANTED as
follows:
(1) Exhibit A [#112-1] to Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’ Opposed Motion to
Continue Trial Date and Modify Scheduling Order is deemed WITHDRAWN;
(2) The Clerk of the Court is directed to maintain the following document UNDER

-1-

RESTRICTION at LEVEL 3:1 Plaintiffs’ Exhibit A [#112-1]; and
(3) The Court shall consider Plaintiffs’ Exhibit A [#113-1] as attached to the Motion
to Withdraw [#113] as if timely filed as Plaintiffs’ Exhibit A to Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of
Plaintiffs’ Opposed Motion to Continue Trial Date and Modify Scheduling Order [#112].

Dated: November 26, 2013

1

Level 3, the most restrictive, limits access to the document to the Court.
D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2.

-2-

See