Stewart et al v. Board of Trustees for Colorado School for Deaf and Blind et al

Filing 197

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/2/14. Motion to Quash Subpoena to Produce [#195] is DENIED without prejudice.(lgale)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-02664-RM-KLM BPS, a Minor and Disabled Person KATRINA L. STEWART, his Parent and Next Friend, and JOHN P. STEWART, his Parent and Next Friend, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR COLORADO SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND BLIND, COLORADO SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND BLIND, LOUIS TUTT, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Principal for the Colorado School for the Deaf and Blind, and DOES 1-10, who are unknown persons, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Quash Subpoena to Produce [#195] (the “Motion”), filed by Interested Party Colorado Department of Education (“CDE”). CDE seeks to quash the Subpoena to Produce served on it by Plaintiffs because the sought-after records are “privileged or protected, vague, overbroad, and subject CDE to an undue burden.” Plaintiffs object to the Motion. However, CDE also states that “Plaintiffs’ counsel and counsel for CDE have agreed to work together to pursue limitations on the subpoena that would be acceptable to both parties.” Thus, although CDE conferred with Plaintiffs’ counsel pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a), it is clear that the parties have yet to fully and meaningfully confer and that they may yet reach resolution without intervention by the Court. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#195] is DENIED without prejudice. Dated: June 2, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?