Miller v. Kastelic et al

Filing 155

AMENDED MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 150 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Previously Filed Response to Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Amende d Response and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, which is liberally construed as a motion to file a surreply. Plaintiff shall file a surreply on or before 1/21/2014. To the extent that the surreply contains new arguments and/or evidence, the Court will entertain a motion from the Defendants requesting leave to respond. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/7/2014. (mehcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-02677-CMA-MEH LARRY C. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. CAPTAIN KASTELIC, DANIEL REIMER, and LT. RIDGWELL, Defendants. AMENDED MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on January 7, 2014. The Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Previously Filed Response to Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Amended Response and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment [filed January 2, 2014; docket #150] is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff states that his previously submitted response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and his Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment “lack both in their statements . . . and contain no sworn affidavits[.]” The Court liberally construes Plaintiff’s request as a motion to file a surreply. The Court will not strike Plaintiff’s response, but will permit Plaintiff an opportunity to file a surreply, in which he may attach affidavits and clarify any statements made in his response. Plaintiff shall file the surreply on or before January 21, 2014. To the extent that the surreply contains new arguments and/or evidence, the Court will entertain a motion from the Defendants requesting leave to respond.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?