Lofton et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.

Filing 35

ORDER Granting 31 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney: the attorneys appearing for the plaintiffs in this civil action have no further responsibility for the representation of the plaintiffs in this action and shall notify Mr. Lofton of the procedures necessary for him to participate for himself and the corporation in the arbitration proceeding, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/27/2013. (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 12-cv-02707-RPM ALAN LOFTON and ALNTCB, INC., Plaintiffs, v. FedEx GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INCORPORATED, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW _____________________________________________________________________ According to the hearing held today on plaintiffs’ motion to withdraw filed on February 14, 2013, plaintiffs’ counsel William S. Finger and Christi A. Sanders appearing for the plaintiffs and Mark T. Clouatre appearing for the defendant and there being no appearance by Alan Lofton or a corporate representative of ALNTCB, Inc., despite this Court’s order requiring such appearance, and Ms. Sanders having explained an inability to contact Alan Lofton and this case having been stayed pending arbitration, a process which counsel started, and Mr. Lofton having the ability to participate in arbitration for himself and the corporation without counsel, it is now ORDERED that the motion is granted and the attorneys appearing for the plaintiffs in this civil action have no further responsibility for the representation of the plaintiffs in this action and shall notify Mr. Lofton of the procedures necessary for him to participate for himself and the corporation in the arbitration proceeding. DATED: March 27th, 2013 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?