Lofton et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Filing
35
ORDER Granting 31 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney: the attorneys appearing for the plaintiffs in this civil action have no further responsibility for the representation of the plaintiffs in this action and shall notify Mr. Lofton of the procedures necessary for him to participate for himself and the corporation in the arbitration proceeding, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/27/2013. (rpmcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02707-RPM
ALAN LOFTON and
ALNTCB, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
FedEx GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW
_____________________________________________________________________
According to the hearing held today on plaintiffs’ motion to withdraw filed on
February 14, 2013, plaintiffs’ counsel William S. Finger and Christi A. Sanders
appearing for the plaintiffs and Mark T. Clouatre appearing for the defendant and there
being no appearance by Alan Lofton or a corporate representative of ALNTCB, Inc.,
despite this Court’s order requiring such appearance, and Ms. Sanders having
explained an inability to contact Alan Lofton and this case having been stayed pending
arbitration, a process which counsel started, and Mr. Lofton having the ability to
participate in arbitration for himself and the corporation without counsel, it is now
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the attorneys appearing for the
plaintiffs in this civil action have no further responsibility for the representation of the
plaintiffs in this action and shall notify Mr. Lofton of the procedures necessary for him to
participate for himself and the corporation in the arbitration proceeding.
DATED: March 27th, 2013
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
________________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?