Kinne et al v. Rocky Mountain EMS, Inc.
Filing
99
MINUTE ORDER granting 98 Motion to Strike Defendant's Reply Arguments and/or Exhibits Attached Thereto or in the Alternative Plaintiffs' Motion to File a Sur-Reply. Sur-reply due by 10/10/2014. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 9/25/2014.(alowe)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02710-REB-CBS
KAREN KINNE,
TIM DILL, and
ABRAHAM BACA, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN EMS, INC., d/b/a ROCKY MOUNTAIN MOBILE MEDICAL,
Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER1
The matter is before the court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Defendant’s Reply
Arguments and/or Exhibits Attached Thereto or in the Alternative Plaintiffs’ Motion
to File a Sur-Reply [#98]2 filed September 24, 2014. After reviewing the motion and the
record the court has concluded that the portion of the motion requesting to file a sur-reply
should be granted.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Defendant’s Reply Arguments and/or
Exhibits Attached Thereto or in the Alternative Plaintiffs’ Motion to File a Sur-Reply
[#98] filed September 24, 2014, is GRANTED;
2. That on or before October 10, 2014, plaintiffs may file a sur-reply addressing
only factual contentions and arguments raised for the first time in the reply [#95] of the
defendants; and
3. That the the sur-reply shall be limited to nine (9) pages.
Dated: September 25, 2014
1
This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E.
Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.
2
“[#98]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?