Brumfeil v. U.S. Bank et al

Filing 72

MINUTE ORDER Plaintiffs unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Opposition to CS Defendants Motion to Dismiss filed April 12, 2013; docket # 60 is denied as moot; Plaintiffs unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Opposition to CS Defendants Motion to Dismiss filed April 12, 2013; docket # 60 is denied as moot; Plaintiffs renewed and unopposed Motion to Correct the Caption and the Amended Complaint to Reflect the Proper Name of Defendant filed April 12, 20 13; docket # 62 is granted in that the Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the caption in this case to Robert J. Hopp ; Plaintiffs unopposed Request to Re-Serve Defendants MERS, Robert Hopp and Cynthia Mares filed April 12, 2013; docket # 66 is construed by the Court as a motion for extension of time within which to serve these Defendants and is granted, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/15/2013.(ervsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02716-WJM-MEH
LISA KAY BRUMFEIL,
Plaintiff,
v.
U.S. BANK,
LARRY CASTLE, in his corporate and individual capacities,
CASTLE STAWIARSKI, LLC,
ROBERT J. HOPP, in his and corporate and individual capacities,
CYNTHIA MARES, Public Trustee in her official capacity,
MERS, a division of MERSCorp, and
DOES 1-100,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 12, 2013.
Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Opposition to CS
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [filed April 12, 2013; docket #60] is denied as moot. Plaintiff seeks
an “extension” to April 25, 2013; however, pursuant to D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1C and Fed. R. Civ. P.
6(d), Plaintiff’s response to the Defendant’s motion (filed April 5, 2013) is due on or before April
29, 2013.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Brief in Opposition to the CS Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss in Excess of 15 Pages [filed April 12, 2013; docket #61] is denied without prejudice for
Plaintiff’s failure to identify the number of pages she requires “to be concise yet thorough in
responding to the complex issues” raised by the CS Defendants.
Plaintiff’s renewed and unopposed Motion to Correct the Caption and the Amended
Complaint to Reflect the Proper Name of Defendant [filed April 12, 2013; docket #62] is granted
in that the Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the caption in this case to “Robert J. Hopp” as set
forth above.
Plaintiff’s unopposed Request to Re-Serve Defendants MERS, Robert Hopp and Cynthia
Mares [filed April 12, 2013; docket #66] is construed by the Court as a motion for extension of time
within which to serve these Defendants and is granted. Plaintiff shall serve Defendants MERS,
Robert Hopp and Cynthia Mares on or before April 19, 2013.