Schutte v. Colorado Department of Corrections (BVCF) et al
ORDER granting 31 Motion to Amend Case Caption by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 4/26/13.(dkals, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Christine M. Arguello
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02725-CMA-MEH
JOHN DAVID SCHUTTE,
STATE OF COLORADO, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
JOHN DAVIS, Warden, Individually and in his official capacity,
STEVEN GREEN, Individually,
RICK THOMPKINS, Individually,
JASON LENGERICH, Individually,
GREGORY SMETHERS, Individually,
RICHARD FISHER, Individually,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND CASE CAPTION
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Amend Case
Caption (Doc. # 31). The Court, being fully advised in the premises and for good cause
shown, GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. It is hereby
ORDERED that the case caption in this matter shall be amended to reflect as
The following Defendants are terminated from the case: (1) Colorado
Department of Corrections (BVCF); (2) William Burnel; (3) Tony Carochi; (4) Tom
Clements; (5) Brian Coleman; (6) Gary Edmonds; (7) Thomas Fisher; and (8) Green.
The following Defendants remain as parties to the case, with the indication
of their capacity as official or individual: (1) John Davis, in his individual and official
capacities; (2) Rick Thompkins, in his individual capacity; (3) Jason Lengerich, in his
individual capacity; and (4) Gregory Smethers, in his individual capacity.
The following Defendants are added as parties to the case: (1) State of
Colorado, Department of Corrections; (2) Steven Green, in his individual capacity; and
(3) Richard Fisher, in his individual capacity. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the caption on all subsequent filings shall reflect the
foregoing changes to the parties in this case. The caption to this instant Order sets
forth the correct parties.
BY THE COURT:
CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?