Colorado Casualty Insurance Company v. Infinity Land Corporation et al
Filing
85
ORDER granting 80 Second Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/26/13.(bnbcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02748-WYD-BNB
COLORADO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Hampshire corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
INFINITY LAND CORPORATION, a dissolved Colorado corporation,
H2 LAND CO, LLC, a dissolved Colorado limited liability company,
HOWARD FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC, a dissolved Colorado liability company,
JONATHAN HOWARD,
PAUL HOWARD,
KF 103 CV, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company,
WILLIAM MARCHANT,
MAUREEN M. MARCHANT,
WILLIAM E. HOWELL, as Successor Trustee of the MARILYN J. HOWELL TRUST,
C. ARLENE NANCE,
WILLIAM PECK,
DARRELL H. OLIVER,
KELLY ANN OLIVER, and
SUSAN HANSON,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on the Second Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order
[Doc. # 80, filed 9/3/2013] (the “Motion”). I am informed that the state court case underlying
this declaratory judgment action is likely to result in the entry of a final appealable order within
the next eight weeks. In the meantime, numerous hurdles preclude this case from proceeding
through disclosures and discovery.
IT IS ORDERED:
(1)
The Motion [Doc. # 80] is GRANTED;
(2)
All deadlines established in the Scheduling Order [Doc. # 49] are VACATED;
(3)
The case is set for a status conference on November 21, 2013, at 8:30 a.m., in
and
Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver,
Colorado.
Dated September 26, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?