Colorado Casualty Insurance Company v. Infinity Land Corporation et al

Filing 89

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 87 . ORDERED that this action is administratively closed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR41.2 subject to reopening for good cause. Absent a meritorious request to reopen this case on or before December 19, 2014, the matter will be dismissed without prejudice without any further notice to either party by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/19/13.(jjhsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.

12-cv-02748-WYD-BNB

COLORADO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Hampshire corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
INFINITY LAND CORPORATION, a dissolved Colorado corporation,
H2 LAND CO, LLC, a dissolved Colorado limited liability company,
HOWARD FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC, a dissolved Colorado liability company,
JONATHAN HOWARD,
PAUL HOWARD,
KF 103 CV, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company,
WILLIAM MARCHANT,
MAUREEN M. MARCHANT,
WILLIAM E. HOWELL, as Successor Trustee of the MARILYN J. HOWELL TRUST,
C. ARLENE NANCE,
WILLIAM PECK,
DARRELL H. OLIVER,
KELLY ANN OLIVER, and
SUSAN HANSON,
Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING AND AFFIRMING RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge (“Recommendation”), filed November 20, 2013. (ECF No. 87). In the
Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Boland recommends that this action be
administratively closed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2 subject to reopening for good
cause. (Recommendation at 2). The Recommendation is incorporated herein by
reference. See 28 U.S.C. ' 36(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

Magistrate Judge Boland advised the parties that written objections were due
within fourteen (14) days after service of a copy of the Recommendation.
(Recommendation at 2). Despite this advisement, no objections were filed to the
Recommendation. No objections having been filed, I am vested with discretion to review
the Recommendation Aunder any standard [I] deem[] appropriate.@ Summers v. Utah,
927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985)
(stating that "[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of
a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when
neither party objects to those findings"). Nonetheless, though not required to do so, I
review the Recommendation to "satisfy [my]self that there is no clear error on the face of
the record."1 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) Advisory Committee Notes.
Having reviewed the Recommendation, I am satisfied that there is no clear error on
the face of the record. I find that Magistrate Judge Boland=s Recommendation is
thorough, well reasoned and sound. I agree with Magistrate Judge Boland that this
matter should be administratively closed.
Based on the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Boland
(ECF No. 87) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. In accordance therewith, it is
ORDERED that this action is administratively closed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR

1

Note, this standard of review is something less than a "clearly erroneous or contrary to
law" standard of review, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), which in turn is less than a de novo review, Fed. R.
Civ. P. 72(b).

-2-

41.2 subject to reopening for good cause. Absent a meritorious request to reopen this
case on or before December 19, 2014, the matter will be dismissed without prejudice
without any further notice to either party.
Dated: December 19, 2013
BY THE COURT:

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Senior United States District Judge

-3-