McDonald v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
Filing
78
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 75 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 37 Motion for an order Compelling Oral Testimony, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/29/2013. (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02749-MSK-MEH
R. KIRK MCDONALD,
Plaintiff,
v.
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.,
CITIBANK, N.A.,
CHASE FUNDING MORTGAGE LOAN, and
ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES 2002-4,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on May 29, 2013.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 37 Motion for an order Compelling
Oral Testimony [filed May 24,2013; docket #75] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply
with Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(1)(A)(iii).1
At the outset, the Court notes that Fed. R. Civ. P 37(a)(1) governs a motion to compel
deposition testimony pursuant to a third-party subpoena. See First Nat’l Bank at Thermopolis v. W.
Cas. & Sur. Co., 598 F.2d 1203, 1205 (10th Cir. 1979). Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1) requires a party
seeking to compel discovery to provide “notice to other parties and all affected persons. . .” The
Certificate of Service attached to the Motion reflects that Plaintiff gave notice to Defendants’
counsel; however, the Motion contains no evidence that the entities served with the subpoenas
received appropriate notice.
Second, the subpoenas at issue in the Motion are defective insofar as they do not conform
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(1)(A)(iii), which requires a subpoena to “command each person to whom
it is directed to [attend and testify] at a specified time and place. . .” Rather than providing “a
specified time,” the subpoenas Plaintiff served provide a range of dates in a given week. This is not
acceptable.
1
The Court is also somewhat concerned with the propriety of service, as the name of the
process server is not legible and appears to be Plaintiff’s name. The Court reminds Plaintiff that he
is not eligible to serve a subpoena pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(b)(1).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?