Faircloth v. Schwartz, et al

Filing 83

ORDER of Dismissal as to Defendant Mrs. Murray, Only. Petitioner's Motion To Dismiss a Defendant Party [#80] is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against defendant, Mrs. Murray, are DISMISSED. Defendant, Mrs. Murray, is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 7/30/2013.(klyon, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02764-REB-KLM
JAMES FAIRCLOTH,
Plaintiff,
v.
CELIA SCHWARTZ, Legal Assistant for BVCF, Individual and Official Capacities,
MR. GERRY GLAND, Hearings Officer for BVMC/BVCF, Individual and Official
Capacities, and
MRS. MURRAY, Food Services Sargent BVMC/BVCF, Individual and Official
Capacities,
Defendants.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT MRS. MURRAY, ONLY
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on Petitioner’s Motion To Dismiss a Defendant Party
[#80]1 filed July 29, 2013. After reviewing the motion and the record, I conclude that the
motion should be granted and that plaintiff’s claims against defendant, Mrs. Murray,
should be dismissed.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That Petitioner’s Motion To Dismiss a Defendant Party [#80] filed July 29,
2013, is GRANTED;
2. That plaintiff’s claims against defendant, Mrs. Murray, are DISMISSED; and

1

“[#80]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.

3. That defendant, Mrs. Murray, is DROPPED as a named party to this action,
and the case caption is amended accordingly.
Dated July 30, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

2