Newman et al v. Harlan et al
ORDER granting 118 Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's Remaining Claims with Prejudice. This case is closed. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/20/2015.(mlace, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action Number: 12-cv-02797-REB-KMT
NANCY NEWMAN, individually and as Personal Representative of The Estate of John
MICHAEL D. HARLAN and
J. L. SMITH TRUCKING CO.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The matter is before me on the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s
Remaining Claims with Prejudice [#118],1 filed October 19, 2015. After careful review
of the motion and the file, I conclude that the motion should be granted and that the
claims of plaintiff, Nancy Newman as Personal Representative of The Estate of John
Newman, against defendants, Michael D. Harlan and J.L. Smith Trucking Co., which
constitute all remaining claims in this matter (see Order Approving Settlement as to
Plaintiff Nancy Newman [#96], filed August 25, 2014 (dismissing claims of plaintiff
Nancy Newman, individually) should be dismissed with prejudice.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s Remaining Claims with
Prejudice [#118], filed October 19, 2015, is granted;
“[#118]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper
by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.
2. That the claims of plaintiff, Nancy Newman as Personal Representative of
The Estate of John Newman, against defendants, Michael D. Harlan and J.L. Smith
Trucking Co., are dismissed with prejudice, with the affected parties to pay their own
attorney fees and costs; and
3. That this case is closed.
Dated October 20, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?