Newman et al v. Harlan et al

Filing 119

ORDER granting 118 Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's Remaining Claims with Prejudice. This case is closed. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/20/2015.(mlace, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action Number: 12-cv-02797-REB-KMT NANCY NEWMAN, individually and as Personal Representative of The Estate of John Newman, Plaintiffs v. MICHAEL D. HARLAN and J. L. SMITH TRUCKING CO. Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Blackburn, J. The matter is before me on the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s Remaining Claims with Prejudice [#118],1 filed October 19, 2015. After careful review of the motion and the file, I conclude that the motion should be granted and that the claims of plaintiff, Nancy Newman as Personal Representative of The Estate of John Newman, against defendants, Michael D. Harlan and J.L. Smith Trucking Co., which constitute all remaining claims in this matter (see Order Approving Settlement as to Plaintiff Nancy Newman [#96], filed August 25, 2014 (dismissing claims of plaintiff Nancy Newman, individually) should be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s Remaining Claims with Prejudice [#118], filed October 19, 2015, is granted; 1 “[#118]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 2. That the claims of plaintiff, Nancy Newman as Personal Representative of The Estate of John Newman, against defendants, Michael D. Harlan and J.L. Smith Trucking Co., are dismissed with prejudice, with the affected parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs; and 3. That this case is closed. Dated October 20, 2015, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?