Persistent Capital Management, LLC v. White Oak Strategic Fund II, L.P. et al
Filing
61
ORDER of Dismissal. The Stipulated Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice [# 60 ] is GRANTED. The Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation Conference set3/21/2014, are VACATED. The jury trial set to commence 4/7/2014, is VACATED. Any pending motion is DENIED as moot. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/8/2013.(klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02831-REB-KMT
PERSISTENT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
WHITE OAK STRATEGIC FUND II, LP,
WHITE OAK GLOBAL ADVISORS, LLC,
WHITE OAK PARTNERS, LLC, and
ANDRE HAKKA, an individual,
Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Blackburn, J.
The matter is me on the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice [#60]1
filed August 6, 2013. After reviewing the motion and the record, I conclude that the
motion should be granted and that this action should be dismissed with prejudice with
each party to bear its own fees and costs.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice [#60] filed August 6,
2013, is GRANTED;
2. That the Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation Conference set
March 21, 2014, are VACATED;
1
“[#60]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.
3. That the jury trial set to commence April 7, 2014, is VACATED;
4. That any pending motion is DENIED as moot; and
5. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay
their own attorney fees and costs.
Dated August 8, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?