Amin v. Clements et al

Filing 81

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 66 May 9, 2013 Recommendation that the Claims Against Defendant Don Boyer be Dismissed. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Don Boyer are dismissed without prejudice and Defendant Don Boyers name shall be removed from the caption of this action. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 06/12/13. (alvsl)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02889-RM-MJW
ABDULLAH KRU AMIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
IVETT RUIZ, A.V.C.F., Colo. Dept. Corr. Mental Health,
MS. MACKINNON, SOTMP, C.D.O.C.,
DON BOYER, Colo. Classification Interstate Compact,
CARL VOIGTSBERGER, Wyo. Classification Interstate Compact, and
RON LAMPERT, Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER ADOPTING
MAY 9, 2013 RECOMMENDATION THAT THE CLAIMS
AGAINST DEFENDANT DON BOYER BE DISMISSED (ECF No. 66)
______________________________________________________________________________
THIS MATTER is before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Michael J.
Watanabe’s (“Magistrate Judge”) May 9, 2013 Recommendation that the Claims Against
Defendant Don Boyer be Dismissed (“Recommendation”) (ECF No. 66). The Recommendation
is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).
The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within
fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. To date, no party has filed
any objections to the Recommendation.
The Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s analysis was thorough and sound, and
that there is no clear error of law or abuse of discretion. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) advisory
committee’s note (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there

is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”); see also
Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (“In the absence of timely objection, the
district court may review a magistrate’s report under any standard it deems appropriate.”).
In accordance with the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The Magistrate Judge=s Recommendation (ECF No. 66) is ADOPTED in its
entirety and made an order of this Court; and
2. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Don Boyer are dismissed without
prejudice and Defendant Don Boyer’s name shall be removed from the
caption of this action.
DATED this 12th day of June, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge

2