Smith et al v. City of Thornton et al
Filing
20
JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of City of Thornton, Bryan Bennett, Bryan (I) Bennett, Christopher Stutters, Christopher (I) Stutters, John Vermilye, John (I) Vermilye, Michael Snook, Michael (I) Snook against Noel Smith, Stephanie Smith, by Clerk on 10/1/2013. (trlee, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02915-WYD-MEH
NOEL SMITH and,
STEPHANIE SMITH,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF THORNTON,
MICHAEL SNOOK, in his individual and official capacity,
CHRISTOPHER STUTTERS, in his individual and official capacity,
BRYAN BENNETT, in his individual and official capacity, and,
JOHN VERMILYE, in his individual and official capacity,
Defendants.
FINAL JUDGMENT
Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Order, filed on
September 27, 2013, by the Honorable Wiley Y. Daniel, Senior United States District
Judge, and incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth, it is
ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants, City of
Thornton; Michael Snook, in his individual and official capacity; Christopher Stutters, in
his individual and official capacity; Bryan Bennett, in his individual and official capacity;
and John Vermilye, in his individual and official capacity, and against Plaintiffs, Noel
Smith and Stephanie Smith, on Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss For Failure To State A
Claim And Application Of Qualified Immunity [ECF Doc. No. 8]. It is further
-1-
ORDERED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the
Plaintiffs’ state law negligence and loss of consortium claims. It is further
ORDERED that this action is remanded to the District Court for Adams County,
CO.
DATED at Denver, Colorado this 1st day of October, 2013.
FOR THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
By: s/ Edward P. Butler
Edward P. Butler
Deputy Clerk
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?