Bell v. Falk et al

Filing 15

ORDER for State Court Record and to Answer, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 1/15/13. (sgrim)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-02917-BNB GREGORY BELL, Applicant, v. FRANCIS FALK, Warden, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Respondents. ORDER FOR STATE COURT RECORD AND TO ANSWER After preliminary consideration of the application for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, IT IS ORDERED: (1) Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order the Respondents shall file with the Clerk of the Court, in electronic format if available, a copy of the complete record of Applicant’s state court proceedings in Arapahoe County District Court case number 00CR1858, including all documents in the state court file and transcripts of all proceedings conducted in the state court, but excluding any physical evidence (as opposed to documentary evidence) not relevant to the asserted claims; (2) Within thirty (30) days from the date the state court record is provided to the Court, Respondent(s) shall file an Answer conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts; and (3) The Clerk of the Court is directed to send copies of this order to the following: (1) Clerk of the Court Arapahoe County District Court 7325 S. Potomac St. Centennial, Colorado 80112; and (2) Assistant Solicitor General Appellate Division Office of the Attorney General 1525 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203; and (3) Court Services Manager State Court Administrator’s Office 101 W. Colfax, Ste. 500 Denver, Colorado 80202. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 15th day of January , 2013. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?