Cambor v. Toyota Financial Services Ameicas Corporation et al
Filing
46
Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 2/18/2014 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Dispositive motion deadline extended to May 30, 2014. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses, and to Determine theSufficiency of Answers 39 , is resolved. FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Date:
February 18, 2014
Courtroom Deputy:
J. Chris Smith
FTR Technician:
Kathy Terasaki
____________________________________________________________________________________
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02928-RPM
ROGER CAMBOR,
Paul D. Cooper
Plaintiff,
v.
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION doing business as
TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES,
a Delaware corporation, headquarters in California,
Bret B. Goodman
Defendant.
____________________________________________________________________________________
COURTROOM MINUTES
____________________________________________________________________________________
Hearing on Motion to Compel
1:55 p.m.
Court in session.
Court’s preliminary remarks.
Mr. Cooper informs the Court that the issues in the motion to compel have been resolved and the parties
would like an extension of time with respect to the dispositive motions deadline to the end of May 2013.
Counsel further inform the Court that parties intend to engage in mediation.
Court states its practice regarding orders of reference to magistrate judge for settlement (joint motion).
Counsel answer questions asked by the Court regarding whether the vehicle was a lease or purchase
agreement.
Mr. Goodman states it was a purchase agreement.
ORDERED:
Dispositive motion deadline extended to May 30, 2014.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses, and to Determine the
Sufficiency of Answers [39], is resolved.
2:02 p.m.
Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 07 min.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?