Cambor v. Toyota Financial Services Ameicas Corporation et al

Filing 46

Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 2/18/2014 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Dispositive motion deadline extended to May 30, 2014. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses, and to Determine theSufficiency of Answers 39 , is resolved. FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Date: February 18, 2014 Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki ____________________________________________________________________________________ Civil Action No. 12-cv-02928-RPM ROGER CAMBOR, Paul D. Cooper Plaintiff, v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION doing business as TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES, a Delaware corporation, headquarters in California, Bret B. Goodman Defendant. ____________________________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES ____________________________________________________________________________________ Hearing on Motion to Compel 1:55 p.m. Court in session. Court’s preliminary remarks. Mr. Cooper informs the Court that the issues in the motion to compel have been resolved and the parties would like an extension of time with respect to the dispositive motions deadline to the end of May 2013. Counsel further inform the Court that parties intend to engage in mediation. Court states its practice regarding orders of reference to magistrate judge for settlement (joint motion). Counsel answer questions asked by the Court regarding whether the vehicle was a lease or purchase agreement. Mr. Goodman states it was a purchase agreement. ORDERED: Dispositive motion deadline extended to May 30, 2014. Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses, and to Determine the Sufficiency of Answers [39], is resolved. 2:02 p.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 07 min.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?