DeAtley et al v. Keybank National Association et al

Filing 69

ORDER. Discovery due by 3/31/2014. Dispositive Motions due by 4/30/2014. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 7/3/2014. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/10/2014. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/8/13. (mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 12-cv-02973-PAB-BNB ALAN DEATLY, NAPI (Colorado) LLC, a Washington limited liability company, and 15 CORPORATIONS, INC., a Washington limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, an Ohio corporation, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ The parties appeared today for a status conference. Consistent with matters discussed at the status conference, IT IS ORDERED that the case schedule is modified to the following extent: Discovery Cut-Off: March 31, 2014 (All discovery must be completed by the discovery cut-off. All written discovery must be served so that responses are due on or before the discovery cut-off.) Dispositive Motions Deadline: April 30, 2014 Expert Disclosures: (a) The parties shall designate all experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before January 31, 2014 (b) The parties shall designate all rebuttal experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before February 28, 2014 Final Pretrial Conference: A final pretrial conference will be held in this case on July 10, 2014. A Final Pretrial Order shall be prepared by the parties and submitted to the court no later than July 3, 2014. Dated November 8, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?