Kissing Camels Surgery Center, LLC et al v. HCA Inc. et al

Filing 352

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Status Conference, and Motion Hearing held on 11/19/2015 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Motion for Order Joining SurgCenter as Counterclaim Defendant 316 filed by Defendant United Healthcare of Colorado is ARGUED, SUBMITTED and TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. A joint status report is due on or before 12/10/2015, with a complete list of issues to be discussed at the Discovery Conference. A Discovery Conference is set for 12/14/2015 02:00 PM for two hours, in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. FTR: Courtroom C-204. (Attachments: # 1 Minute Order re: Discovery Dispute Chart) (bsimm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-03012-WJM-NYW KISSING CAMELS SURGERY CENTER, LLC, CHERRY CREEK SURGERY CENTER, LLC, ARAPAHOE SURGERY CENTER, LLC, and HAMPDEN SURGERY CENTER, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. CENTURA HEALTH CORPORATION, COLORADO AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER ASSOCIATION, INC., ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL SERVICE, INC. d/b/a ANTHEM BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF COLORADO, UNITED HEALTHCARE OF COLORADO, INC., and AETNA, INC., Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang In anticipation of the Discovery Conference set for December 14, 2015 at 2:00 p.m., IT IS ORDERED: 1. Counsel shall submit to Chambers any written materials, in addition to the Joint Status Report, which they wish to discuss at the Discovery Conference; 2. To the extent any of the disputes involve written discovery, the Parties shall complete and submit the written discovery dispute chart in the following example form, with the most persuasive authority included: Issue Interrogatory No. 1 DATED: November 20, 2015 Moving Party’s Position Overly broad contention interrogatory. Witt v. GC Servs. Ltd. Partnership, -F.R.D. --- (2014), Case No.13–cv–02834–RBJ– CBS, 2014 WL 6910500, *5 (D. Colo. Dec. 9, 2014). Opposing Party’s Position Contention interrogatory is the appropriate vehicle and is less burdensome than a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition on this topic. Teashot LLC v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., Case No. 12-cv-0189WJM-KLM, 2014 WL 485876, *7 (D. Colo. Feb. 6, 2014).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?